The Homunculus

Psychology, Anthropology, Evolution

Archive for November, 2009

We’re watching.

Posted by Joy Icayan on November 27, 2009

Psychologists have used the subway train as a playground for social psychology experiments, observing behavior of people in certain situations. How would you react for instance if someone collapses on the floor? If someone asks you to mail a letter? And which part of the train is conducive for er, romance?

So what experiments/studies would you like to conduct in the train, or in the MRT/LRT? These are mine:

1. How will people will react to a person noisily arguing on the phone? Will the perception of that person change according to gender?

2. How much constriction of physical space is tolerable? Does it change depending on how the person is surrounded (whether front/back/side)?

3. How will a person react if an attractive person introduces himself/herself and engages in small talk? Who are more likely to entertain these requests, does it differ on the time of day (rush hour versus more relaxed times), and supposing they get off the same station, do are more likely to continue the conversation outside the train?

4. Those annoying ads in the MRT. Just how much of those details do we remember, what factors influence retention? (Personally they irritate me for the whole 30 minute ride).

Advertisements

Posted in psychology | 2 Comments »

Beware the marshmallow

Posted by Joy Icayan on November 26, 2009

Here’s a video of the marshmallow test if you’ve ever wanted to see how it’s done, or simply want to watch cute kids trying to resist that marshmallow.

The original test was conducted by Stanford professor Walter Mischel in the 1960s, where four year olds were left in a room with a marshmallow, and were promised another one if they could wait for the experimenter who would then be gone for 20 minutes. Mischel followed up on these children years later and found out that those who had been able to wait, or engage in delayed gratification,  did better in their SATs, had fewer aggression problems and were better adjusted in school according to their teachers. Mischel was also able to find a correlation between seconds of delay in eating the marshmallow and ability in handling frustration. They were also less likely to be involved in drugs and were more likely to have higher BMIs.

I was looking for stories of those who actually gobbled up the marshmallow and came across Lehrer’s New Yorker article where he talks of a high delayer and a delayer, both coming from the original group of kids, among other (a bit depressing) things. Moral lesson from the great Mischel himself: allocation of attention, don’t think about the marshmallow. Just don’t.

Links:

Delay of Gratification in Children

Don’t! The Secret of Self Control

Posted in psychology | Leave a Comment »

On Maguindanao

Posted by Joy Icayan on November 26, 2009

The recent massacre in Maguindanao conducted by at least a hundred armed men on 52 individuals composed of journalists, lawyers, female members of the rival clan, and even passers by has aroused significant outrage in the Philippines and prompted the disturbing questions – of those who committed the murders, was there no one who stood up and said, this is just wrong. Considering the facts now known – the systematic killing/burial in broad daylight, the rapes and the beheadings, where does morality stand?

Former Defense Secretary/presidentiable Gilbert Teodoro said, The massacre was a barbaric act that can be done only by a lunatic person or group, but was it really that? Would it be perhaps even more difficult to accept if the people involved simply acted in the heat of the moment – their moral stands kept at bay, performing their ‘duties’, then going back to take the other roles in their lives, as community members, as fathers and sons? Would it be easier to accept that perhaps there was one, or two, or several dissenting voices, perhaps muffled by the rest? Speaking up does have its consequences as proven by the massacre – that a person seeking to challenge the political reign would get his family killed, his lawyers, his witnesses.

There are no answers to these and not much comfort to the families and friends of those lost. We join the rest of the nation in condemning the act, and the culture of fear and impunity which as made it all possible.

Posted in human rights, philippines | Leave a Comment »

Live that moment

Posted by Joy Icayan on November 23, 2009

Moment: A specific point in time, especially the present time.

From Steven Maloney, the psychological present lasts three seconds…

And since we live permanently convinced that the past is past and it will be amended, and the future, even the immediate future, will certainly be better and with fewer errors, since we live permanently from and critical of our own past, permanently removed from and in the hope of our oncoming future, the present-time frame of several seconds is the only unconditional manifestation of our ego.

In this sense, our ego lasts three seconds.  Everything else is either hope or an embarrassing incident.  Usually both.

– Miroslav Holub, “The Dimension of the Present Moment”

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

forgiveness, for real?

Posted by Joy Icayan on November 19, 2009

The Forgiveness Project details stories of grieved men and women who have chosen to forgive, and sometimes reconcile. These are not victims of minor offenses, but rather various forms of human indignity and brutality, physical/sexual assaults, tortures and genocides etc. Some have even bravely sought out their perpetrators to converse and seek understanding.

Is forgiveness another Oprah phenomenon, or are we truly capable of the genuine kind? A recent study on Bosnia and Herzegovina (During the genocide, Serbs raped and killed hundreds of thousands of Bosnian Muslims),  showed that Bosnians who had high quality contact with Serbs, showed more empathy and positive attitudes towards them. This is also called the contact hypothesis.

Just having read The Brain That Changes Itself (Norman Doidge), while disagreeing with some of the stuff written there, I’m inclined to think forgiveness or a change of attitude/perception involves plasticity in the brain, forming of new connections which need to be reinforced over time if they are to last.  Like how stroke patients relearn skills associated with brain functions that have been damaged, through practice and determination. Forming it as a habit, again. Which is probably why outsiders will never understand, because they operate on a different framework, a framework that has its own rules (some crimes are simply unforgivable), reinforced by internal (biases/attitudes) and external (religion, society) factors.

And which is also probably why some people can relapse from forgiving and why it isn’t always an Oprah story.

Links:

The Forgiveness Project

Promoting Forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Brain That Changes Itself website

The Forgiveness Project: David’s Story

Posted in psychology | Leave a Comment »